Penso che quando uno scrive bene in italiano, anche i traduttori automatici se ne accorgano .... eventuali errori potranno essere usati alla bisogna per confutare / ritrattare opinioni a seconda del maturare dell'esperienza ....
non sono affatto in grado di giudicare se tutti gli aggettivi, i sostantivi o quant'altro .... suonino consoni alle intenzioni di Roberto ma questo può essere la bozza su cui gli esperti possono apporre le proprie correzioni ...
My conclusions
Pulled by Mr.De Sanctis I am writing the final thoughts on this goal, as predicted by Andrea Rightly, alternative results that convinces others that really show the limits of a project certainly very courageous and, in my humble opinion, will meet however, very successful.
1) The optics, at wider apertures, is suffering from an apparent coma and often baffles even the most closed, a palpable chromatic aberration.
The latter is obviously less invasive in b & w best picture quality beyond suspicion.
2) Visually and in terms of design the Nocton 47 / 1.1 is not very similar to the Noctilux 50 / 1 but its late predecessor, the Noctilux 50 / 1.2, also the barrel reminds us very closely.
Contrary to all the dedicated optical Voigtlander Leica M is not aspherical elements are present and that is denounced by the absence of written on the front ring, perhaps at least one aspherical element would have earned no small way to this goal even more than all other production Cosina newer.
One wonders Whether an aspherical element would involve a real cost increase such as to incline to the view that his exclusion on certain workers have been accepted even as the optical Nocton 50 / 1.5 and that is decidedly different group.
3) The perspective is very well taken care of in the accuracy of the fire that often, however, missing in Noctilux preasferico and other superluminosi competition.
The limited rotation needed to move from the minimum focusing distance to infinity helps make it particularly easy to use even in critical lighting conditions or situations hasty use.
4) Vignetting are particularly low, although naturally present in this as in all the extreme optical brightness but does not disturb too much, to full-aperture highlights a decline in aggressiveness that you recover quickly closing even 1 / 2 stop diaphragm.
5) The blur is not always great but in certain situations is remarkably similar to that given by targets much, much more expensive, making this "normal" an excellent compromise. Certain characteristics, then, make it very suitable to be kept on the machine as a universal optical band, with the Leica Noctilux Which is not always possible.
6) slightly wide-angle focal length (it's not a 47 to 50) play to the advantage of a slightly greater depth of field even at room temperature and this helps not just in the case of optical systems with Which the fire was very nearly reduced to a handful of mm.
7) The cost is tasty and varied content, depending on the vendor, between U $ 650 (plus transportation and various imposts) and € 1.100 in at around 850/900 € and this cut, as they say, the head of the bull Because The price quality relationship is extraordinarily high.
ERGO
This is excellent optics, Which opens the door to the charm of superluminosi to many who would otherwise have to stay out of it, is certainly an excellent target for the palates, while purposes but not highly sophisticated, those who have already tasted some shots taken with Noctilux preasferico a "right" can not hide certain limits Which May Not Affect Their Use.
One wonders of course if that 1 / 3 of the diaphragm in multiple warrants more weight and size of the lens but that goes for any light that opens beyond f/1.4 Noctilux understood.
Basically, for those who want to take away the desire to work with a couple of inches depth of field, is an extraordinary compromise between price, space, quality and possible final MERCHANTABILITY if not completely satisfied.
In short, a horse race, not being a thoroughbred, Demonstrates qualities of competitiveness and elegance uncommon and it is intended, in my opinion, to meet an incredible success among fans of "available light or ambient light.
The perspective also shows lightweight trasfocatura around 4 / 5 meters and Areas in Which the sharpness is not constant, just look at the last step of my trials focusing on the central part of the roof of the Bridge of Bassano, where the tiles are mixed in only one point while they are razor sharp at right and left.
Last view (but not least) the risk of a possible inconsistency between a sample and the other always present in the production of Mr.Kobayashi of the past two or three years but who has never seen a disappointing Summilux raise your hand ...
Regards
_________________
Roberto
RPO - Site Admin
____________________________
http://www.robertopieroottavi.com
http://www.leicapassionforum.it
Email
robertoottavi@gmail.com
. 
